linux-kernel - [PATCH] alpha: fix two section mismatch warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070727212641.GA16236@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:26:41 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] alpha: fix two section mismatch warnings

Fix the following section mismatch warnings:

WARNING: o-alpha/vmlinux.o(.text+0x1a4d4): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:free_area_init (between 'paging_init' and 'srm_paging_stop')
WARNING: o-alpha/vmlinux.o(.text+0x1a4dc): Section mismatch: reference to .init.text:free_area_init (between 'paging_init' and 'srm_paging_stop')

One instance of paging_init() was declared __init but not the other one - used by defconfig.
Fixed by declaring the second instance ___init too.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
---
diff --git a/arch/alpha/mm/init.c b/arch/alpha/mm/init.c
index 550f490..5e6da47 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/mm/init.c
@@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ callback_init(void * kernel_end)
 /*
  * paging_init() sets up the memory map.
  */
-void
-paging_init(void)
+void __init paging_init(void)
 {
 	unsigned long zones_size[MAX_NR_ZONES] = {0, };
 	unsigned long dma_pfn, high_pfn;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/