linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707281017230.3442@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Michael Chang <thenewme91@...il.com>
cc:	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	CK Mailinglist <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Michael Chang wrote:
> 
> I do recall there is one issue on which Con wouldn't budge -- anything
> that involved boosting certain kinds of processes in the kernel.

I did that myself, so that's a non-issue.

No. The complaints were about the CK scheduler not being as responsive 
under load as even the _old_ scheduler was. I don't know why people ignore 
this fact. It was a long thread back in March or April, and I'm pretty 
sure the CK mailing list was cc'd.

Sure, most people don't actually have load-averages above ten etc, but 
it's important to do those well _too_. 

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/