linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070728225148.a0e58fdd.diegocg@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:51:48 +0200
From:	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	Jonathan Jessup <jonathanjessup@...il.com>,
	Grzegorz Kulewski <kangur@...com.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ck@....kolivas.org, lkml@...anurb.dk
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

El Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:05:25 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> escribió:

> So "modal" things are good for fixing behaviour in the short run. But they 
> are a total disaster in the long run, and even in the short run they tend 
> to have problems (simply because there will be cases that straddle the 
> line, and show some of _both_ issues, and now *neither* mode is the right 
> one)

I fully agree with this, but plugsched could have avoided this useless "division"
on the topic of SD vs CFS. IMO that counts as an advantage, too ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/