[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8bd0f97a0707271837q5d5f31d9pe342e72ebf9368c1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:37:14 -0400
From: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: "Robin Getz" <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: "Yoann Padioleau" <padator@...adoo.fr>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv
On 7/27/07, Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> wrote:
> If there is a definite style or semantic preference that everyone should live
> with - does it make sense to put checks in checkpatch.pl to enforce it?
checkpatch.pl does not have enough semantic knowledge to know if the
thing being tested is a pointer ... dont know if the sparse utility
would be able to pick it out as i'm not familiar with what level that
thing runs at
-mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists