linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f8gf7v$o89$1@sea.gmane.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 01:16:20 +0300
From:	Alex Besogonov <cyberax@...wise.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	ck@....kolivas.org
Subject:  Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I personally feel that modal behaviour is bad, so it would introduce what 
> is in my opinion bad code, and likely result in problems not being found 
> and fixed as well (because people would pick the thing that "works for 
> them", and ignore the problems in the other module). 
I'm sorry, but this argument doesn't hold water. It was invoked years 
ago and turned out to be incorrect - the new CFS scheduler is not just a
fixed old scheduler, it's a completely redesigned one.

-- 
With respect,
             Alex Besogonov (cyberax@...wise.com)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/