linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18090.33898.360087.492895@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:48:58 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Yoann Padioleau <padator@...adoo.fr>
Cc:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/powerpc

Yoann Padioleau writes:

> When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.

As other people have said, if you're going to spend time on this,
testing (!buf) is more idiomatic in the kernel than (buf == NULL).

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/