[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46AAEDEB.7040003@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 09:19:07 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: david@...g.hm
CC: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@....com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFT: updatedb "morning after" problem [was: Re: -mm merge plans
for 2.6.23]
On 07/27/2007 09:43 PM, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> On 07/27/2007 07:45 PM, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
>>
>>> Questions about it:
>>> Q) Does swap-prefetch help with this?
>>> A) [From all reports I've seen (*)]
>>> Yes, it does.
>>
>> No it does not. If updatedb filled memory to the point of causing
>> swapping (which noone is reproducing anyway) it HAS FILLED MEMORY and
>> swap-prefetch hasn't any memory to prefetch into -- updatedb itself
>> doesn't use any significant memory.
>
> however there are other programs which are known to take up significant
> amounts of memory and will cause the issue being described (openoffice
> for example)
>
> please don't get hung up on the text 'updatedb' and accept that there
> are programs that do run intermittently and do use a significant amount
> of ram and then free it.
Different issue. One that's worth pursueing perhaps, but a different issue
from the VFS caches issue that people have been trying to track down.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists