linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] SOFTWARE_SUSPEND: handle HOTPLUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46AB073D.6010802@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Sat, 28 Jul 2007 11:07:09 +0200
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	david@...g.hm, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] SOFTWARE_SUSPEND: handle HOTPLUG_CPU automatically

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> [ For extra bonus points: the SUSPEND_POSSIBLE thing is still pretty 
>>   complicated, and it might actually be a better idea to make it a 
>>   per-arch config option,
...
> This would give you "trying to assign nonexistent symbol SUSPEND_POSSIBLE"
> kconfig warnings on architectures without SUSPEND_POSSIBLE.

Unless /all/ architectures define it, of course.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== -=== ===--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/