[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070729153049.GA13309@linuxace.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 08:30:49 -0700
From: Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
To: "Darryl L. Miles" <darryl-mailinglists@...bauds.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP SACK issue, hung connection, tcpdump included
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 06:59:26AM +0100, Darryl L. Miles wrote:
> The problems start around time index 09:21:39.860302 when the CLIENT issues
> a TCP packet with SACK option set (seemingly for a data segment which has
> already been seen) from that point on the connection hangs.
I'd say most likely scenario is the SERVER is behind a Cisco Pix firewall,
which has known bugs in handling packets with sack option. By default the Cisco
has sequence number randomization enabled, but it's a half-assed implementation
which doesn't bother adjusting the sequence numbers inside sack options.
This has been reported to Cisco, and they don't seem to care. As a workaround,
you can do this:
echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_sack
and it will probably fix it up. It'd be really nice, however, to have a per-route
option for sack, similar to how we can clamp window scaling per route. Something
like the below
ip r a <host> <gw> <nosack>
Phil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists