linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070729174239.GA20399@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:42:39 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
Cc:	ck@....kolivas.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkml@...anurb.dk
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1

On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 12:56:28PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag 29 Juli 2007 schrieb Sam Ravnborg:
> > > I
> > > actually also think that the communication between Ingo and Con could
> > > have been better especially when Ingo decided to write CFS while Con
> > > was still working hard on SD.
> >
> > You realize that Ingo posted his code for anyone to look at/comment at
> > about 48 hours after he started to work on CFS?
> 
> Yes.
So whats wrong then?
Ingo decides to do a better scheduler - to some extent inspired by Con's work.
And after 48 hours he publish first version that _anyone_ can see and comment on.
Whats wrong with that?

Did you expect some lengthy discussion before the coding phase started or what?

Just trying to understand what you are arguing about.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/