linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200707292323.29601.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:23:28 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, david@...g.hm,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

On Sunday, 29 July 2007 12:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > 
> > > OK, I'll prepare a patch to introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND, but that will require
> > > quite a bit of (compilation) testing on different architectures.
> > 
> > Sure. I'm not too worried, the fallout should be of the trivial kind. 
> >
> > Also, mind basing it on the (independent) cleanups that Adrian already 
> > sent out. This is all intertwined..
> 
> OK, it took more time than I had hoped, but I wanted CONFIG_HIBERNATION and
> CONFIG_SUSPEND to be really independent of each other.
> 
> The two patches in the next messages implement the idea:
> * replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION
> * introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary,
>   and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each
>   other.

Unfortunately, the patches that I have posted are against 2.6.23-rc1 with the
suspend and hibernation patchset applied
(http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/hibernation_and_suspend/2.6.23-rc1/patches/) .

Sorry for that.

The corresponding patches on top of the current -git are in the next two
messages.

They do the following:
* replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION
* introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND that selects CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU, if necessary,
  and make it possible to choose suspend and hibernation independently of each
  other
* update the top-level PM-related headers and the ACPI code related to suspend
  and hibernation to use the new definitions

Greetings,
Rafael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/