linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rt 2/9] Dont allow non-threaded softirqs and threaded hardirqs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070730092331.GB25640@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:23:31 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt 2/9] Dont allow non-threaded softirqs and threaded
	hardirqs


* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:

> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> 
> I think this was sent before, and it did cause problems before. Would 
> there be *any* reason to have non-threaded softirqs but threaded 
> hardirqs. I can see lots of issues with that.

please elaborate in precise terms: what issues can you see?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/