linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b21f8390707291820k7bd3b55la41ba0bf582ea4ef@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:20:46 +1000
From:	"Matthew Hawkins" <darthmdh@...il.com>
To:	John <darknessenvelops@...il.com>
Cc:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	"Kasper Sandberg" <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

On 7/30/07, John <darknessenvelops@...il.com> wrote:
> I understand that, I was just wondering if the FPS scales the same natively
> vs. Wine as I typically only run native games.  I have been hesitant to move
> over to CFS due to reports of 3D issues and wanted to see if you had numbers
> in regards to CFS vs. SD.

John, the numbers Ingo makes and the numbers you make will no doubt be
different (unless by some fantastic freak of nature you both have
identical systems).  Take this opportunity to do this testing yourself
so in case there is some improvement to make, it can be done for
2.6.23.  Nobody can benchmark your system but you.

Remember to set CONFIG_HZ to 1000

-- 
Matt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/