[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0707301035060.12082@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:36:01 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Lee Howard <faxguy@...ardsilvan.com>
cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, rmk@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: serial flow control appears broken
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Lee Howard wrote:
> >The serial drivers have nothing to do about it -- all they can do is pushing
> >data upstream, to the discipline driver. They can provide an interface to
> >hardware flow control features though, if implemented by a given UART.
> >
>
> Thank you for this clarification. So I should have more correctly been saying
> that "tty flow control appears broken". Right?
Probably. It might be, as Alan suggested, that it is meant to work, but
the latency kills it.
Maciej
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists