linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46AE18AE.50305@tigershaunt.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:22 -0400
From:	Rashkae <rashkae@...ershaunt.com>
To:	schwidefsky@...ibm.com
CC:	Matthew Hawkins <darthmdh@...il.com>, ck@....kolivas.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

Martin Schwidefsky wrote:

> 
> Do we care ? The code should be replaced with ptep_get_and_clear +
> pte_modify anyway..
> 

Since the general direction of this thread was for people to test 3D 
game performance with the shiny new CFS cpu scheduler, I would say yes, 
we do care if people with the only 2 types of gaming caliber Video cards 
can get said video cards working, right now, with said shiny new kernel.

Yes yes, I know, kernel devs don't care if they break binary drivers... 
and in principle, I agree with that philosophy.. but it's still damn 
inconvenient at times :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/