[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707291717410.3442@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, david@...g.hm,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND
(updated)
Ok, I took this, and modified Len's patch to re-introduce ACPI_SLEEP on
top of it (I took the easy way out, and just made PM_SLEEP imply
ACPI_SLEEP, which should make everything come out right. I could have
dropped ACPI_SLEEP entirely in favour of PM_SLEEP, but that would have
implied changing more of Len's patch than I was really comfy with).
Len, Rafael, please do check that the end result looks ok.
I suspect ACPI could now take the PM_SLEEP/SUSPEND/HIBERNATE details into
account, and that some of the code is not necessary when HIBERNATE is not
selected, for example, but I'm not at all sure that it's worth it being
very fine-grained.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists