[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707310559380.17287@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:03:20 +0530 (IST)
From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 -mm 0/9] netconsole: Multiple targets and dynamic
reconfigurability
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:17:41 +0530
> Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> > [0/9] netconsole: Multiple targets and dynamic reconfigurability
> >
> > This is v3 of the patchset
>
> That all looks pretty reasonable, thanks.
>
> Are we all comfortable with the attributions? As I have it now, everything
> will go in as having been authored by yourself. There is no formal (ie:
> understood-by-git) way of recording joint authorship, unfortunately. But one
> can make a record of such things in the changelog.
Ok, making such a record would be good, if possible. I did see that the
"author" field for git commits can have only one entry, unfortunately,
and it turns out "Signed-off-by" and "Acked-by" have other meanings
attached that have to do with the patch-journey-from-author-to-you chain.
But I'd like these to be somehow marked as jointly authored, definitely.
> I'll queue this material up in the to-be-sent-to-davem queue.
Ok, thanks.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists