linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization for cpus other than montecito

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:02:13 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	"Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net" <Zoltan.Menyhart@...l.net>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush icache before set_pte take6. [4/4] optimization
 for cpus other than montecito

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:29:32 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:15:50 -0600
> "David Mosberger-Tang" <dmosberger@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > This seems crazy to me.  Flushing should occur according to the
> > *architecture*, not model-by-model.  Even if we happen to get "lucky"
> > on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks.  
> 

BTW, how about the quality of patch[2/4] ?

If it is enough well, I want it to be merged....

please..
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/