[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070731085713.GA15136@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:57:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:46 +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
>
> > could perhaps be filesystem related, i have my maildir(extremely
> > large) on reiserfs, and /home on xfs. what my mail client will do is
> > download mail, spamasassin it(loading database from home), then it
> > will put to imap server placing it on reiserfs, and then a "local"
> > copy in my home.
>
> Ooh, do you perchance have PREEMPT_BKL=y?
>
> If so, try on another filesystem than reiserfs (or disable
> PREEMPT_BKL, but that is obviously the lesser of the two choices).
>
> Ingo traced a 1+ second latency at my end to BKL priority inversion
> between tty and reiserfs.
ah, indeed, that makes quite a bit of sense. Almost all of the Reiser3
code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure
that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code. Kasper, as a debugging
matter, could you try to move that spamassassin workload off into a
non-Reiser3 filesystem and/or disable PREEMPT_BKL? If that makes a
noticeable difference (for the better ;) then we can continue figuring
out what's happening exactly.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists