[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070731.020219.78708972.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mark@...hpc.demon.co.uk
Cc: aaw@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
wli@...omorphy.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [SPARC32] NULL pointer derefference
From: Mark Fortescue <mark@...hpc.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:55:20 +0100 (BST)
> I have formulated a patch that prevents the update_mmu_cache from doing
> enything if there is no context available. This apears to have no
> immediate, undesirable side effects.
>
> This worked better than the alternative of setting up a context to work with.
>
> Can you for see any issues in doing this?
>
> If not, can you check+apply the attached (un-mangled) patch.
Thanks for tracking this down Mark.
The issue is that, when exec()'ing to userspace from a kernel thread,
we need activate_context() to be invoked before we try to touch
userspace at all. This new argument handling is invoking
get_user_pages() before that happens.
activate_context() happens via flush_old_exec(), but that occurs via
load_elf_binary() et al. which is long after the argument fetching
code runs in fs/exec.c that is using get_user_pages().
(Mark, hint: activate_context() is defined to switch_mm() on
sparc32, which is sun4c_switch_mm() which you thought was only
invoked from context switches :-))
Touching userspace before activate_context() is questionable at best,
in my opinion. But I can't come up with a good way to fix this right
now other than Mark's sparc patch, so I will apply it.
Thanks again Mark!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists