[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070731090815.GF5101@hasse.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:08:15 +0200
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/26] ext2 white-out support
On Tue, Jul 31, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2007 09:44 +0200, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > Ok, this is pretty similar to the way I implemented this for tmpfs. The
> > problem is that the union mount code is explicitly checking if the filesystem
> > is supporting whiteout. I used to use a new filesystem flag (FS_WHITEOUT) for
> > this but thought that disk filesystem like ext2/3/4 will have problem with
> > that if you mount an old image. So I guess I still need a feature flag.
>
> You also need whiteout support for extents. This could be done with
> unwritten extents potentially, or as I previously proposed (RFC) in
> linux-ext4.
Maybe. But this is about something totally different: a whiteout filetype, an
existing file that when it is found make the VFS return -ENOENT.
Cheers,
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists