linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200707311116.39857.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:16:39 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	david@...g.hm, Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki:

> Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume()
> callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them
> built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-)

These are what USB runtime power management uses. How many code
paths for power management do you want to introduce?

	Regards
		Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/