linux-kernel - Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:19:26 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...o.co.il>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Kasper Sandberg <lkml@...anurb.dk>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ck@....kolivas.org
Subject: Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d   ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> For the tty layer I'm waiting for the revoke code to get finished up 
>> and move from -mm into Linus tree. At that point the real evil 
>> lock_kernel related stuff in the tty layer can switch to using the 
>> revoke code for hangup paths and then other bits can be tackled.
>>     
>
> oh, wonderful! Alan, you are a true wizard :-) The tty layer is one of 
> the very few pieces of kernel code that scares the hell out of me :-)
>
>   

Maybe it should be kept crufty then.  Every kernel developer should have 
at least one part of the kernel he's afraid to go into ;-)


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/