[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070731134824.6ec78447@frecb000686.frec.bull.fr>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:48:24 +0200
From: Sébastien Dugué <sebastien.dugue@...l.net>
To: Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux RT Users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jean Pierre Dion <jean-pierre.dion@...l.net>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] Fix RT balancing tasks pulling
Hi Josh,
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:50:34 -0700 Josh Triplett <josht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 15:42 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > this one-liner fixes a bug in balance_rt_tasks() which sometimes manifests by
> > having a lower prio task being scheduled while a higher prio task is sitting
> > waiting on another runqueue.
> >
> > This is pretty hard to reproduce on low cpu count machines, for example, I
> > had to have sched_football run in a loop for ~38h before it failed on a dual HT
> > Xeon box.
>
> Very impressive find, and this does seem to improve things in some
> cases.
>
> However, with 2.6.22.1-rt8, which includes this patch, I still managed
> to get some failures after a few hours on an 8-way (quad dual-core) box.
> Preliminary results so far:
> 420 Final ball position: 0
> 2 Final ball position: 1
>
Darn, I thought it was it :(
I had a ~60h run on my box with the very same kernel without a single
failure.
Do you have any other user RT load running when those failures pop up?
Anyway, back to scheduler code dissection now.
Sébastien.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists