[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070731152526.0e21e234@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:25:26 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, satyam@...radead.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] sysfs: make sysfs_add_one() automatically check for
duplicate entry
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:15:08 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com> wrote:
> Make sysfs_add_one() check for duplicate entry and return -EEXIST if
> such entry exists. This simplifies node addition code a bit.
>
> This patch doesn't introduce any noticeable behavior change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/sysfs/dir.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
> fs/sysfs/file.c | 12 +++++-------
> fs/sysfs/symlink.c | 9 +++------
> fs/sysfs/sysfs.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> index 8ce3ffb..69e57be 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> @@ -491,9 +491,15 @@ void sysfs_addrm_start(struct sysfs_addrm_cxt *acxt,
> *
> * LOCKING:
> * Determined by sysfs_addrm_start().
> + *
> + * RETURNS:
> + * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
The only possible failure is -EEXIST, so I'd state that explicitly,
especially since you rely on that fact below.
Otherwise
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists