linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070731165433.GA8180@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:54:33 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:30:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> > What is worse, even if you touch just one little header in some corner
> > (or possibly none) and type "make" on an "already-made" tree,
> > headers_check still feels obliged to check all the headers.
> 
> Didn't Sam have a better fix for that?
In another .git here but not yet quite ready.
Got sidetracked by even more section mismatch stuff. If I had knew
how much work that had generated I had not integrated these harmless
scripts in modpost I think ;-)

I will give it a spin soon and post an update.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/