[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IFyEK-00042c-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:22:08 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: chuck.lever@...cle.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kzak@...hat.com, sfrench@...ba.org,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, mark.fasheh@...cle.com,
kurt.hackel@...cle.com
Subject: Re: request for patches: showing mount options
> >> After a successful mount, the NFS mount command tucks some options into
> >> /etc/mtab that reflect which mountd was used for the mount, and what
> >> protocol version and port was used for the mount request. Those options
> >> are not passed to the kernel, and do not appear in /proc/mounts today.
> >> See nfs(5)'s discussion of the mountport, mounthost, mountprog, and
> >> mountvers options.
> >>
> >> However, the trend for NFS is to push mount option parsing into the
> >> kernel. Thus all options will be passed to the kernel, and at that
> >> point it should be able to reflect the mount* options in /proc/mounts.
> >> But it doesn't do that quite yet.
> >
> > Trond, do you have a roadmap for this?
>
> Well I'm actually doing the coding, and Trond is playing more of an
> architectural role.
OK, what your estimage for this then?
It would be nice to have all this stuff in 2.6.24, which doesn't leave
a lot of time.
But if it's just those four options you mentioned, it should be
managable. I do not think there needs to be some generic code to
hande userspace-only options, it would be perfectly fine just to
parse, store and show them like all the other options.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists