[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <a414f3b506b7802a717e6e2c08befd1e@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 00:36:14 +0200
From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] MPC8349E-mITX: use platform IDE driver for CF interface
>>> + ide@...00000 {
>>> + compatible = "mmio-ide";
>>> + device_type = "ide";
>
>> Why not "ata"?
The hardware is called (E)IDE, the protocol is called ATA.
Or that's what I was told -- I think there's some historic
revisionism involved, too.
> Also, what mmio-ide in the compat properly means in the context of
> ide_platform which is able to handle both port and memory mapped IDE.
> I think
> we must get rid with this crap, and since this IDE register mapping is
> pretty
> much board specific, call it something like "mpc8349emitx-ide" instead.
"mmio-ide" simply is not specific enough. The device_type
should go, too.
If this IDE interface is board-specific, thee "compatible"
property should include the board vendor name and board
name. Oh, that's what "emitx" tries to do -- it could be
a bit clearer perhaps ;-)
Segher
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists