linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:16:09 -0700
From:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
	Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
	gurudas pai <gurudas.pai@...cle.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, wen.gang.wang@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add check do_direct_IO() return val

> Does a patch like this work? I don't have any test-cases, but it  
> would be
> good to have something like this tested and passed back with proper
> explanations and sign-offs.

It should, yeah.

I'm bringing up a more capable IO testbed over here.  I'll run it  
through the tests I have once that setup.  I wouldn't cry if someone  
beat me to it ;).

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/