linux-kernel - Re: Cleaning up the USBHID's blacklist.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708011409460.26230@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:11:10 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...os.cz>
To:	Chr <chunkeey@....de>
cc:	linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Cleaning up the USBHID's blacklist.

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Chr wrote:

> But I have one (final?) question. Since I am sometimes stuck to 80x25 
> console...
>  can we alphabetically sort the blacklist by the Vendor (the first 
> field), instead of the quirk field(last field)? Or is there a 
> technical/theoretical reason behind it?

I find the blacklist sorted by quirk type more convenient - we typically 
want to know "who has this particular quirk", but we generally don't care 
"what quirks does this particular vendor have".

-- 
Jiri Kosina
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/