[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708011422000.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:27:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> > [...] the increase in code size:
> >
> > 2.6.22:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 10150 24 3344 13518 34ce kernel/sched.o
> >
> > recent git:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 14724 228 2020 16972 424c kernel/sched.o
> >
> > That's i386 without stats/debug. [...]
>
> that's without CONFIG_SMP, right? :-) On SMP they are about net break
> even:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 26535 4173 24 30732 780c kernel/sched.o-2.6.22
> 28378 2574 16 30968 78f8 kernel/sched.o-2.6.23-git
That's still quite an increase in some rather important code paths and
it's not just the code size, but also code complexity which is important
- a major point I tried to address in my review.
> (plus a further ~1.5K per CPU data reduction which is not visible here)
That's why I mentioned the increased runtime memory usage...
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists