linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200708011009.10761.rrnelson@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 10:09:10 -0500
From:	Bob Nelson <rrnelson@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	eranian@....hp.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.22 new perfmon code base + libpfm + pfmon

On Wednesday 01 August 2007 09:22:41 am Bob Nelson wrote:

> It looks to me like you were saying you would remove this extension to the
> OProfile file system (/dev/oprofile/implementation).
> However, it looks like it has made it into the mainline kernel code.  As David
> pointed out, the value isn't initialized for architectures other than i386.  As
> a result you get a kernel crash (at least on PPC) with the following commands.
> 
> opcontrol --init
> cat /dev/oprofile/implementation
> 
> Kevin Corry is working on a patch but until that makes it out people may want
> to be a little careful with this...
> 
My misunderstanding.  We wound up with the older version of the patch in our
version of the kernel.  It looks like the offending code was removed from the
later version of the patch.

Bob


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/