[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708011955430.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 20:01:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CFS review
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Andi's theory cannot be true either, Roman's debug info also shows this
> /proc/<PID>/sched data:
>
> clock-delta : 95
>
> that means that sched_clock() is in high-res mode, the TSC is alive and
> kicking and a sched_clock() call took 95 nanoseconds.
>
> Roman, could you please help us with this mystery?
Actually, Andi is right. What I sent you was generated directly after
boot, as I had to reboot for the right kernel, so a little later appeared
this:
Aug 1 14:54:30 spit kernel: eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
Aug 1 15:09:56 spit kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 656747233 ns)
Aug 1 15:09:56 spit kernel: Time: pit clocksource has been installed.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists