[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070801202551.GB225@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 00:25:51 +0400
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RT: Add priority-queuing and priority-inheritance to workqueue infrastructure
On 08/01, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 22:26 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > No, the "tail" option has nothing to do with prioritize, we can't remove
> > it. Please look at the code.
>
> So you insert a work struct that executes last which wakes the flushing
> thread?
No, tail == 1 means a "normal" work, tail == 0 means "just after the
->current_work". Yes, the latter is to wake up the flusher at the "right time".
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists