linux-kernel - Re: kupdate weirdness

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:14:39 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kupdate weirdness

On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:45:16 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:

> The following strange behavior can be observed:
> 
> 1. large file is written
> 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> 4. then nr_dirty again goes down by 1024
> 5. repeat from 3. until whole file is written
> 
> So basically a 4Mbyte chunk of the file is written every 30 seconds.
> I'm quite sure this is not the intended behavior.
> 
> The reason seems to be that __sync_single_inode() will move the
> partially written inode from s_io onto s_dirty, and sync_sb_inode()
> will not splice it back onto s_io until the rest of the inodes on s_io
> has been processed.

It does all sorts of weird crap.

> Since there will probably be a recently dirtied inode on s_io, this
> will take some of time, but always less than 30 sec.
> 
> I don't know what's the easiest solution.
> 
> Any ideas?

Try 2.6.23-rc1-mm2.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/