[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46AFFCFC.7020902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:24:44 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
edwintorok@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] Expose Power Management Policy option to users
Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
>> I don't think the interface you're suggesting is a good one. Do you?
>
> I think if it's applicable to SCSI at all it is fine. If it is not, then
> I think we need to make do with the interface we are given. I do not think
> we should hold up a feature for libata sysfs integration.
Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here and leave the
decision to James and Jeff.
>>> I can assert that I think ALPM is a good idea,
>>> because I've never had a report of it causing problems. Windows has
>>> been using this feature for a very long time - and you have to admit that
>>> they have a pretty large market share. Nobody is complaining about ALPM
>>> increasing device malfunction, so unless you have proof it seems insane
>>> to nak due to this.
>> Is ALPM enabled by default? How do they deal with the performance
>> degradation?
>
> I believe so, but I'm obviously not privvy to their implementation details.
It would be *really* great if we can find more about how they do it.
How and when it's enabled and on which systems. Is it possible to find
this out?
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists