[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070801061901.GA10134@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:19:01 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de> wrote:
> > _after_ the dup_task_struct(). Then change sched_fork() to return a
> > CPU number - hence we dont have a separate sched_fork_suggest_cpu()
> > initialization function, only one, obvious sched_fork() function.
> > Agreed?
>
> That puts task struct, kernel stack, thread info on the wrong node.
ok, i missed that - your patch looks then fine to me.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists