[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1158166a0708020313r22201c3bm722ec5bb050e609b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:13:15 +0100
From: "Denis Vlasenko" <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam@...radead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] Introduce strtol_check_range()
On 8/2/07, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Please, copy strtonum() from BSD instead. Nobody needs another
> > > home-grown converter.
> >
> > BSD's strtonum(3) is a detestful, horrible shame.
> >
> > The strtol_check_range() I implemented here does _all_ that strtonum()
> > does, plus is generic w.r.t. base,
>
> What you did with base argument is creating opportunity to fsckup,
> namely, forgetting that base is last and putting it second.
Embedding base in function name (func10, func8, func16 [, func2])
will eliminate that possibility and also save one argument
push on stack.
You can always multiplex them locally:
static int func_generic(base...) {...}
int func10(...) { return func_generic(10, ....); }
int func8(...) { return func_generic(8, ....); }
You also can have a faster "static int func_power_of_2(base...)" for
2,8,16, etc.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists