lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B1FC6D.7010202@felicis.org>
Date:	Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:46:53 +0200
From:	Martin Roehricht <ml@...icis.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduling the highest priority task

On 08/02/2007 05:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Martin Roehricht <ml@...icis.org> wrote:
> 
>> That's fine with me, that within the same priority-queue any task can 
>> be chosen. But assume two tasks with highly different priorities, such 
>> as 105 and 135 are scheduled on the same processor and one of them is 
>> now to be migrated -- shouldn't be the queue with task P=105 
>> considered first for migration by this code? Both tasks would use 
>> different queues with their own linked lists, right?
> 
> yes. What makes you believe that the lower priority one (prio 135) is 
> chosen? [ as i said before, that will only be chosen if all tasks in the 
> higher-priority queue (prio 105) are either already running on a CPU or 
> have recently run so that the cache-hot logic skips them. ]

This believe is primarily based on my observations of multiple benchmark 
runs and also on your statement earlier: »in the SMP migration code, the 
'old scheduler' indeed picks the lowest priority one«.

Perhaps it is just an unfortunate coincidence that at ~90% of the time a 
migration decision is made, the higher priority process is currently 
cache hot whereas the lower priority process is not. That would be 
unlucky for me as I would like to decide upon specific runtime 
circumstances whether the highest or the lowest priority job of a 
runqueue should be migrated to another CPU. :-/

Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ