[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070802161437.GA22493@skynet.ie>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 17:14:37 +0100
From: mel@...net.ie (Mel Gorman)
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl
On (02/08/07 09:44), KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki didst pronounce:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
> Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com> wrote:
> > [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> > when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
> >
>
> It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
> user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until ZONE_MOVABLE in all node
> is exhausted. This is an expected behavior, I think.
>
This is expected behaviour. I see no reason for lower zones to be used
for allocations that use memory from a higher zone with free memory.
> I think the real problem is the scheme for "How to set zone movable size to
> appropriate value for the system". This needs more study and documentation.
> (but maybe depends on system configuration to some extent.)
>
It depends on the system configuration and the workload requirements.
Right now, there isn't exact information available on what size the zone
should be. It'll need to be studied over a period of time.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists