[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200708021859.06411.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 18:59:05 +0200
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>
To: ck@....kolivas.org
Cc: whansard@...global.net, Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Klaus Schulz <Klaus.Schulz@....de>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: ck vs. cfs : realtime audio performance
Am Donnerstag 02 August 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> The tone I see on responses to posts that are CCed to LKML in my
> perception often is just completely and utterly awfully unfriendly. And
> often those responses actual include factual inaccuracies and
> preliminary assumptions as well. Is that how Linux Kernel Management
> Style is supposed to work? I hope not. [...]
Well, if Carlo is not a Linux Kernel manager this comment of mine is
inapprobiate. Sorry for that.
Actually when I remind myself of all the responses I got from Ingo I did
not see anything like that what I have complained about here. I take that
as something where I can learn something: Not nearly every Linux Kernel
manager is a mean and unfriendly bastard who accuses everyone who wants
something merged or has a problem report. ;) (At least Ingo did not
accuse me for my problem reports. If I ever happen to dig that deeply
into the kernel or its documentation that I have something to merge
regarding the scheduler, I can try how he reacts to that...)
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists