| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1IGgS3-0002ib-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:35:15 +0200 From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org CC: miklos@...redi.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kenchen@...gle.com, peterz@...radead.org Subject: Re: kupdate weirdness > There were heaps of problems in there and it is surprising how few people > were hitting them. Ordered-mode journalling filesystems will fix it all up > behind the scenes, of course. > > I just have a bad feeling about that code - list_heads are the wrong data > structure and it all needs to be ripped and redone using some indexable > data structure. There has been desultory discussion, but nothing's > happening and nothing will happen in the medium term, so we need to keep > on whapping bandainds on it. The reason why I'm looking at that code is because of those balance_dirty_pages() deadlocks. I'm not perfectly happy with the per-pdi-per-cpu counters Peter's patch is introducing. I was wondering if we can count the number of writeback pages through the radix tree, just like we do for dirty pages? All that would be needed is to keep the under-writeback inodes on some list as well. But I realize, that this introduces it's own problems as well... Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists