linux-kernel - Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 00:36:40 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:

> Because 5 characters will not fit in a 4 character array, even without the
> null terminator.

On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:

> How should gcc know whether you actually wanted that char foo[len] to
> contain a \0 as last element?

Robert, Stefan, I am sorry, I think, you are VERY wrong here. There is no 
"even" and no guessing. The "string" DOES include a terminating '\0'. It 
is EQUIVALENT to {'s', 't', 'r', 'i', 'n', 'g', '\0'}. And it contains 
SEVEN characters. Please, re-read your K&R. Specifically, the Section 
"Initialization" in the "Function and Program Structure" chapter (section 
4.9 in my copy), the paragraph about initialization with a string, which I 
quoted in an earlier email.

And, Stefan, there is a perfect way to specify a "0123" without the '\0' - 
{'0', '1', '2', '3'}.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/