[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B269FC.6020309@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 01:34:20 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
On 08/03/2007 01:26 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> C99 spec that Al referred you to (available for around US$18 as a pdf)
>> says in 6.7.8, para. 14 (where Al said):
>>
>> "An array of character type may be initialized by a character string
>> literal, optionally enclosed in braces. Successive characters of the
>> character string literal (including the terminating null character if
>> there is room or if the array is of unknown size) initialize the
>> elements of the array."
>
> Wow... So, the terminating '\0' in the string constant IS "special" and
> "optional"... Ok, then, THIS does answer my question, THIS I can
> understand, and, ghm, accept...
>
> Thanks to all who tried to explain this to me and sorry it took so
> long...
Ah come on, it would be great fun to now make the argument that that quoted
bit doesn't actually say wat should happen when there's _no_ room for the
terminating null character...
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists