[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708021302500.8258@enigma.security.iitk.ac.in>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:07:47 +0530 (IST)
From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] type safe allocator
Hi Miklos,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I wonder why we don't have type safe object allocators a-la new() in
> C++ or g_new() in glib?
>
> fooptr = k_new(struct foo, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> is nicer and more descriptive than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*fooptr), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> and more safe than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> And we have zillions of both variants.
>
> Note, I'm not advocating mass replacement, but using this in new code,
> and gradually converting old ones whenever they need touching anyway.
> [...]
>
> +/**
> + * k_new - allocate given type object
> + * @type: the type of the object to allocate
> + * @flags: the type of memory to allocate.
> + */
> +#define k_new(type, flags) ((type *) kmalloc(sizeof(type), flags))
What others already said, plus:
kmalloc()'ing sizeof(struct foo) is not always what we want in C either.
Several kernel structs have zero-length / variable-length array members
and space must be allocated for them only at alloc() time ... would be
impossible to make them work with this scheme.
Satyam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists