[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B318B9.7020107@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:59:53 +0200
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@....net>
To: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: dgc@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fallocate() man page - darft 2
Hi Amit,
>> Could you please review the changes, and the FIXMEs.
>
> Please find my comments below..
Thanks.
[...]
>> .SH DESCRIPTION
>> .BR fallocate ()
>> allows the caller to directly manipulate the allocated disk space
>> for the file referred to by
>> .I fd
>> for the byte range starting at
>> .I offset
>> and continuing for
>> .I len
>> bytes.
>> .\" FIXME Amit: in other words the affected byte range
>> .\" is the bytes from (offset) to (offset + len - 1), right?
>
> <Amit>
> Yes, you are right.
> </Amit>
[...]
>> Preallocating blocks does not change
>> the file size (as reported by
>> .BR stat (2))
>> even if it is less than
>> .\" FIXME Amit: "offset + len" is written here. But should it be
>> .\" "offset + len - 1" ?
>
> <Amit>
> Good point. This text was directly taken from the man page of
> posix_fallocate and is also there on the posix specifications at:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/posix_fallocate.html
>
> The current posix_fallocate() implementation and also the fallocate()
> implementation in ext4 are based on above documentation, wherein EOF is
> compared with "offset + len" and not with "offset + len - 1".
>
> I am not sure if this is right or wrong. But, this is as per posix
> specifications. ;)
> </Amit>
Ahhh -- the off by one error was inside my head! Obviously if we allocate
bytes for offset 1000, len 100, then the affected byte range would run to
offset 1099, giving a file size of 1100 bytes -- that is (offset + len) --
not (offset + len - 1), which is of course the offset of the last byte.
Sorry for the confusion.
[...]
>> .B ENOSYS
>> The file system containing the file system referred to by
>
> <Amit>
> There is a typo above. We have "file system" repeated twice in above
> sentence. Second one should be "file".
> </Amit>
Thanks for catching that.
Okay -- it seems that this page is pretty much ready for publication,
right? I'll hold off for a bit, until nearer the end of the 2.6.23 cycle.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists