[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070803130459.cdd964b7.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:04:59 -0700
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: Only enable autosuspend by default on certain
device classes
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:45:32 -0400, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > My experience suggests the opposite. Of the several I've tried so far,
> > > none have worked with usb suspend.
> >
> > All of mine work. I'm wondering if this has something to do with
> > a hub or motherboard... How should we test it? Tried plugging elsewhere?
>
> no hubs involved, directly plugged them into the mainboard.
> Fairly recent Intel chipsets on all the systems I tested.
Sounds bad.
BTW, when I took over from Vojtech, I looked at the suspend methods
for the printer and it seemed possible that they can only work
if the device is not open when suspend occurs. I was going to look
at that at the first opportunity.
So, I'd rather keep at least some kind of capability to suspend
printers, even if disabled by default. I thought Matthew's patch
was too harsh.
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists