[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B39030.7030009@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:29:36 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Jan-Bernd Themann <ossthema@...ibm.com>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ppc <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Marcus Eder <meder@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Klein <tklein@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@...i.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lro: eHEA example how to use LRO
Jan-Bernd Themann wrote:
> This patch shows how the generic LRO interface is used for SKB mode
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan-Bernd Themann <themann@...ibm.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/net/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h | 9 ++++-
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_ethtool.c | 15 +++++++
> drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
> index f8a602c..fec4004 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
<snip>
> +module_param(use_lro, int, 0);
Have you looked at my generic lro get/set patch that I posted this week? this
adds a useless module parameter while ethtool has all the structure already to
accomodate setting lro on/off.
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists