[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46B2B684.2000207@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:00:52 +0800
From: Carlo Florendo <subscribermail@...il.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gcc fixed size char array initialization bug - known?
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
>> C99 spec that Al referred you to (available for around US$18 as a pdf)
>> says in 6.7.8, para. 14 (where Al said):
>>
>> "An array of character type may be initialized by a character string literal, optionally
>> enclosed in braces. Successive characters of the character string literal (including the
>> terminating null character if there is room or if the array is of unknown size) initialize the
>> elements of the array."
>
> Wow... So, the terminating '\0' in the string constant IS "special" and
> "optional"... Ok, then, THIS does answer my question, THIS I can
> understand, and, ghm, accept...
>
> Thanks to all who tried to explain this to me and sorry it took so long...
You should not have asked in the first place. The declaration
char c[4] = "abcd"
is perfectly valid. There is no cause for debate about it :)
Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Carlo
--
Carlo Florendo
Softare Engineer/Network Co-Administrator
Astra Philippines Inc.
UP-Ayala Technopark, UP Campus Diliman
1101 Quezon City, Philippines
http://www.astra.ph
--
The Astra Group of Companies
5-3-11 Sekido, Tama City
Tokyo 206-0011, Japan
http://www.astra.co.jp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists