lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070803092755.55220aa0.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 09:27:55 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 - fix missing numa_zonelist_order sysctl

On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:07:38 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com> wrote:

> Of course, I don't have any idea of what is a "reasonable amount".
> Guess I could look at non-movable zone memory usage in a system at
> typical or peak load to get an idea.  Anyone have any data in this
> regard?
> 
I'm sorry that I have no data and idea. 
ZONE_MOVABLE is too young to be used under business workload...

just I feel...
Considering i686 which divides memory into NORMAL and HIGHMEM, it seems
that 4G to 8G servers looks stable under various workload in my experience.

Then, at least, 12.5% to 25% of "Total Memory - Hugepages" memory should be
under ZONE_NORMAL. But this is from experience of 32bit/SMP :(

Thanks,
-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ